Many of the experimental participants who were asked how fast two cars in a filmed traffic accident were going when they smashed into each other subsequently recalled seeing broken glass at the scene of the accident. this experiment best illustrated a proactive interference. b the spacing effect. c the self-reference effect. d the misinformation effect. e state-dependent memory.
b) the author proves that he’s biased when he uses terms like “silly” and “stupid”.
hope this !
i think the answer its just a general audience, your first option. so sorry if i'm totally off. i hope you have a great day!
i'g guessing you mean "capitalist pig warmonger? "
an economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development occurs through the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.
this memorandum contrasts this year's restaurant with the last year's one, as it mentions that this time it will be a different place. then, the email sender starts adding contrastive arguments in which he describes how different it will be this year by using adverbs such as 'furthermore', 'also', 'lastly'.
in a way, the memorandum also relates to sentences a, b and d as it includes them (the difference in the types of desserts, breads, waiters, waitresses, however, these are isolated aspects of the whole message and that is the focus here. that is why the difference concerns the restaurants because the elements 'bread', 'waiters', 'vegetables' are part of them while restaurants are the essential element that encompasses the rest.